Pakistan is now the leading source of asylum claims in the UK and the way many applicants are arriving matters as much as the headline total. At the same time, the Home Office is reshaping settlement rules to make permanent residence harder to secure without sustained lawful contribution, while ministers and city leaders are exploring new ways of funding public services through a potential London visitor levy. Taken together, these strands point to a broader shift: tighter control of status-switching, a longer road to indefinite leave to remain and a willingness to ask short-term visitors to contribute more directly to the costs of the system.
Are Pakistani Nationals Turning Tourist, Student and Work Visas into UK Asylum Claims and Forcing a Policy Reset?
Pakistan has become the largest source of asylum claims in the UK and what stands out is not only the scale of applications but the routes many applicants are using to get here. Recent figures show a sharp rise in Pakistani nationals arriving lawfully on temporary visas including visitor, student and work routes and then switching into the asylum system once inside the country. In 2024 alone, close to 10,000 Pakistani nationals moved from a temporary visa into an asylum claim, making Pakistan the most prominent nationality within the wider visa-to-asylum trend.
This is part of a bigger national picture. Home Office data confirms that asylum claims overall have reached record highs, with more than 111,000 people applying in the year ending June 2025. A significant share of those claims now comes from people who did not arrive irregularly but entered legally on time-limited permission and applied for asylum later from within the UK. That shift matters because it changes the policy challenge: the issue is no longer only about the border, it is also about how temporary permission is being used after arrival.
Pakistan at the centre of the switching pattern
Pakistan’s position is unusual because it appears near the top across every major temporary route. The most striking pressure point is the student route. Thousands of Pakistani students transitioned into asylum claims in 2024, outnumbering many other nationalities by a wide margin. The visitor route is smaller in absolute terms but still substantial, with hundreds of people seeking asylum after entering as tourists. Work-route switching shows a similar trend, placing Pakistan among the very highest for skilled worker-to-asylum transitions.
The result is that Pakistan now accounts for around one in ten of all asylum claims in the UK, a dramatic change when viewed against the much lower totals recorded only a few years ago. The speed of the increase is a key part of why this has become politically sensitive.
Public concern is not purely about numbers; it is about trust. When large volumes of claims follow a pattern of legal entry and later route-switching, it reinforces the view that the system can be exploited from within. The phrase used by one former senior ONS figure that the system is being gamed from the inside captures the heart of the policy anxiety.
At the same time, there is no single explanation for the surge. Researchers have pointed to pressures within Pakistan itself, including economic instability, environmental stress, and security concerns in some regions. It is likely that genuine protection needs and opportunistic behaviour are both contributing to the pattern. The difficulty for government is that even a mixed set of causes can still look, to the public, like a loophole being used at scale.
The Home Office response: longer settlement, tougher consequences
Against that background, the Home Office has announced major reforms to settlement, explicitly aiming to break the assumed link between temporary leave and an almost automatic five-year route to indefinite leave to remain.
The government’s earned settlement direction now sets a longer qualifying period before most migrants can apply for indefinite leave to remain. The standard route is expected to extend from five years to ten years for many categories, signalling a clear shift away from settlement being seen as the natural, near-term outcome of temporary stay.
Alongside this, the Home Office has gone further for those who enter unlawfully, overstay, or attempt to prolong their presence through weak claims. Under the new approach, people in those categories may face a settlement qualifying period stretching to 20 years, and asylum status itself is increasingly framed as temporary, with reviews every 30 months to reassess ongoing risk.
The direction of policy is straightforward: reduce the incentive to use asylum as a fallback route to permanence after temporary entry. If switching into asylum has been driven in part by the expectation of a quicker path to settlement, then a longer qualifying clock and tighter protection rules make that strategy far less attractive and far less certain.
Why the tourist tax debate belongs in this story
The mayor of London has cautiously welcomed reports that he is to impose a tourist levy on visitors staying overnight in the capital. If new devolution powers are confirmed, London could introduce an overnight charge similar to those used in other major world cities. The main argument is economic: London hosts enormous numbers of overnight stays and a modest levy could raise significant funds for local transport, infrastructure, and public services that support tourism.
The timing, however, carries a wider significance. Debate about visa misuse and in-country route-switching is happening alongside a broader reconsideration of how short-term mobility affects the UK. A tourist levy is not an immigration control, but it reflects a shifting expectation that short-term visitors should contribute directly to the services and systems their presence relies on. In a climate shaped by public concern over overstaying or switching into asylum, it fits naturally beside tougher settlement rules as part of a wider reset of entry, stay, and contribution.
Closing the loopholes, rebuilding confidence
The rise in Pakistani asylum claims particularly those following legal arrival on visitor, student, or work visas has become a defining stress test for the UK’s immigration framework. When a sizeable share of applications comes from people who first entered lawfully and only later claimed asylum, the system faces pressure on two fronts: operational strain and public confidence.
The Home Office response marks a decisive hardening of the route to permanence. Longer settlement qualifying periods, tougher consequences for unlawful stay and more conditional protection status all point to the same message: temporary permission is not meant to evolve into quick settlement through route-switching. For genuine refugees, protection remains available but within a framework that expects ongoing need to be demonstrated over time.
Meanwhile, the push towards a London tourist levy speaks to a broader public mood. High levels of travel and migration place real costs on public services and infrastructure and the state is increasingly looking for ways to ensure that mobility even short-term mobility is managed firmly and funded fairly.
What the UK’s Policy Reset Means for Migrants and Visitors
Taken together, these developments indicate a clear policy reset. Legal routes are being examined more closely, settlement is becoming harder to reach without sustained lawful residence and short-term visitors may soon be asked to contribute more to the systems they make use of. Whether this strategy succeeds will depend on careful, fair implementation: strong decision-making on asylum claims, proper protection for those who need it and visa policies that deter misuse without undermining legitimate study, work and tourism. If the system gets that balance right, confidence can be rebuilt. If it does not, the pressure practical and political will continue to grow.
Follow us to stay updated on the latest UK immigration changes. With over 20 years of experience and a steadfast commitment to excellence, Morgan Smith Immigration is your trusted partner for all your immigration needs. Contact us today to learn more about how we can assist you with UK visa applications and provide tailored advice for your circumstances. For any enquiries or assistance, call us at 0203 959 3335 or email [email protected].
