The Government’s proposed overhaul of the rules governing indefinite leave to remain (ILR) has triggered significant unease within the Labour Party, with dozens of backbench MPs warning they may vote against the plans. At the centre of the controversy are proposals led by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood to extend the standard qualifying period for settlement from five years to a minimum of ten. Crucially, the changes would apply to many migrants who are already living and working in the UK under the current system.
What Is Changing Under the New Settlement Framework?
Under existing immigration rules, most migrants can apply for ILR after five years of lawful residence, subject to suitability requirements such as good character and compliance with immigration conditions.
From April, the Government intends to replace this model with an “earned settlement” framework. Ten years would become the new baseline for settlement, with the length of time adjusted depending on income levels, employment history, English language ability and use of public funds.
While some migrants would be able to qualify sooner by meeting higher contribution thresholds, others would face significantly longer waiting periods before being eligible to settle permanently in the UK.
Retrospective Application Raises Political and Legal Concerns
A key point of contention is that the new rules would apply to migrants who entered the UK on the understanding that settlement would be available after five years. Labour MPs have described this approach as unfair and damaging to trust in the immigration system.
Several have warned that retrospective changes could expose the Government to legal challenges, particularly where individuals have made long-term decisions such as buying property or raising families based on the existing settlement timetable.
Concerns have also been raised about the wider implications for the UK’s reputation as a predictable and rules-based destination for global talent.
Impact on Public Services and the Labour Market
MPs from across the party have highlighted the potential impact on key sectors already experiencing labour shortages. Health and social care have been singled out as particularly vulnerable, given their recent reliance on overseas recruitment.
Under the proposals, lower-paid migrants in roles below graduate level would face a baseline settlement period of 15 years. For many care workers and their dependants, this would represent a substantial departure from previous expectations.
By contrast, higher earners including those earning above £125,140 per year and certain entrepreneurs on global talent or innovator routes would be eligible for accelerated settlement after three years.
Penalties for Benefit Use and Other Conditions
The new framework would introduce additional penalties linked to benefit use. Migrants who claim public funds for up to one year would see their settlement period extended by five years, while longer periods of benefit use could add a further ten years.
In practical terms, some migrants could face settlement waits of more than 20 years once baseline periods and penalties are combined.
To qualify for settlement, applicants would also need to meet four core conditions:
- maintaining a clean criminal record:
- demonstrating English language proficiency to A-level standard:
- showing sustained employment over at least three years: and
- having no outstanding debts to the Government, including tax or NHS surcharge liabilities.
Who Will Not Be Affected?
The Government has confirmed that the changes will not apply to individuals who already hold ILR. Family members of British citizens and holders of British National (Overseas) visas from Hong Kong will continue to qualify for settlement after five years under existing arrangements.
Political Implications for the Government
The scale of opposition within Labour raises the possibility of a significant parliamentary defeat if the proposals are brought before the Commons in their current form. Several MPs have publicly committed to voting against the measures, arguing that they conflict with Labour’s principles of fairness and economic pragmatism.
Looking Ahead
With the changes scheduled to take effect this year, uncertainty remains for many migrants currently working towards settlement under the existing rules. Much will depend on whether the Government chooses to amend the proposals, particularly in relation to retrospective application.
For affected individuals and employers alike, the coming months are likely to bring further clarification and potentially further political turbulence as the debate over settlement reform continues.
Follow us to stay updated on changes to UK immigration law, policy developments and guidance affecting migrants, employers and families.
With over 20 years of experience and a commitment to excellence, Morgan Smith Immigration is your trusted partner for all your immigration needs. Contact us today to learn more about how we can assist you with UK visa applications. For enquiries or assistance, call us at 0203 959 3335 or email [email protected].
