Starmer’s government has confirmed plans to introduce mandatory digital identity cards for every adult in the UK. The initiative aims to curb illegal immigration by requiring individuals to verify their right to live and work through a digital ID, stored on a smartphone app. Employers and landlords would need to check this ID against a central database before offering jobs or housing.
Supporters argue the “Brit Card” could modernise Britain’s approach, drawing inspiration from Estonia’s integrated national ID system, which underpins everything from banking to healthcare. Ministers emphasise that the system could streamline paperwork for workers, renters and public services, replacing a patchwork of existing processes.
Yet, this represents a radical departure from Labour’s past stance. Only a year ago, senior figures rejected the idea of mandatory identity cards and historically, British governments have struggled to persuade the public, abandoning earlier attempts under Tony Blair amid fierce opposition.
The Price of Progress: Cost and Complexity
Despite being pitched as free for citizens, the infrastructure itself will be anything but. Designing, implementing and maintaining a nationwide digital ID system will cost billions. Businesses and individuals will also face a steep learning curve.
Employers already grapple with the Right to Work share code system, many still unaware of how it functions years after its introduction. Layering a new digital ID requirement risks adding confusion instead of clarity, especially for small businesses with limited compliance resources.
Security in an Era of Cyber Threats
The government’s digital track record raises serious concerns. UK has witnessed a sharp rise in hacking incidents and data breaches, including in government systems. If the central digital ID database were compromised, the fallout could be catastrophic, potentially exposing the identities and immigration statuses of millions.
As yet, ministers have not explained what contingency measures would be in place to deal with such breaches. With cyberattacks becoming increasingly sophisticated, critics argue this is not a hypothetical risk but an imminent reality.
Lessons from Past Rollouts: A Troubled History
Skepticism also stems from the UK’s poor track record in rolling out large-scale digital systems:
- Right to Work Checks: Years after implementation, confusion remains widespread, with many employers struggling to understand the share code system.
- EU Settlement Scheme: Introduced post-Brexit, the scheme was plagued by technical glitches, missed deadlines and repeated extensions, leaving many applicants in limbo.
- eVisas: The recent push to replace physical residence permits with eVisas sparked panic and uncertainty. Multiple shifting deadlines, sudden changes and communication failures consumed enormous resources and left many scrambling, particularly older or less tech-savvy applicants.
These precedents raise the question: if the government struggled with these narrower initiatives, how will it manage a universal ID system covering the entire population?
The European Experience
Across Europe, digital ID systems are well-established, offering valuable lessons. Estonia, Belgium and Spain operate national ID frameworks that integrate seamlessly into daily life. However, these successes are the product of decades of gradual investment in digital infrastructure and public trust.
By contrast, UK appears to be attempting rapid advancement without laying the same foundations, which raises doubts about whether the system can deliver the promised efficiency.
Public Impact: Streamlined Life or “Checkpoint Society”?
For citizens, possession of the digital ID would be compulsory but its use would largely surface during employment, housing, or public service checks. Proponents highlight convenience: replacing multiple forms of paperwork with a single secure identifier.
Yet critics warn this risks creating a checkpoint society, where citizens are routinely forced to prove their identity to access basic services. Civil liberties groups and opposition parties have voiced fears of creeping authoritarianism, inefficiency and privacy erosion.
Conclusion: Reform with No Guarantee of Success
Starmer’s digital ID proposal is one of the most ambitious attempts in decades to reform how Britain manages identity and immigration. Its potential to streamline checks and reduce fraud is clear. But the risks, soaring costs, data security threats and a history of flawed government tech rollouts, cannot be ignored.
For employers, the system may introduce yet another layer of bureaucracy and for individuals, particularly those less digitally literate, it could complicate rather than simplify daily life. Without transparency, strong safeguards, and widespread public education, the digital ID risks joining the long list of expensive government missteps.
The stakes are high: this initiative will shape how individuals interact with employers, landlords and the state, reviving Britain’s longest-running debate between freedom and control.
Prepare early for such changes and switch to eVisa by getting your applications submitted and approved with Morgan Smith Immigration whether that is for an extension of leave, indefinite leave to remain, or applying for your British citizenship. With over 20 years of experience and a proven commitment to excellence, Morgan Smith Immigration is your trusted partner for all UK immigration needs. For any enquiries or assistance, call us at 0203 959 3335 or email [email protected].
